As a whole I think people are more comfortable being around or seeing life from there own perspective. It's the way people live and survive. You go to bigger cities such as Chicago or New York and and cultures and ethnic groups can be segregated within one city. For example China town. People want to the option to be able see there own through there interpretation and through their own media outlet. However as we know having the resources to be able to watch there own channels is not feasable it takes money and for some that is not an option.
The question can be raised is it the responsibility of the media within the USA to offer those outlets? It is necessary to be able to know what is going on in the world like through CNBC etc. But should it be our responsibilty to offer an international station.
Friday, February 25, 2011
Friday, February 18, 2011
Based on our discussion Thursday regarding children and the impact that children's television have on them in my opionion falls on the parent. Children are going to copy and try to act out what they watch on tv, whether it is spongebob or even transformers. Where I think the problem comes in is the lack of parental control. More parents are putting their children in front of the T.V. to get them out of their hair. I think you need to educate your children and make them understand what is real and what is not. I do think people want to put the responsibility on other sources, meaning that want to blame other things. "Its that Damn TV" or "Its those Damn Video Games". Please. Parents just need to be aware. Children are going to be influenced and as a they get older it will be by their peers.
Friday, February 11, 2011
Stereotyping
To anyone who interested, comments will be welcome, but everyone try to put themsevles in another persons race. How do you think you would see the world? How do you think people will see you?
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Gender
As stated Gender is a set of characteristics distinguishing between male and female, particularly in the cases of men and women. Depending on the context, the discriminating characteristics vary from sex to social role to gender identity. Moving away from the sexual orientation of a person, what else can we say about gender.
Gender puts us into roles that are set forth in Biology, is it fair no. Example like stated in class women are given an automatic disadvantage when looking for a job, the employer automatically seperates the women from a man because of the ability to have children, women ultimatley will need to medically take off from work and care for the infant and nurture herself.
The workforce is greatly prejudice between the two genders. When you step back and look at careers today, their is definatley an identity to a profession that is chosen, another example, is that more physical jobs are geared to the male gender, now is that due to prejudice or biology? When I look at firefighters, is it realistic to believe that a female firefighter would be able to carry out a person twice their size, should the same equality be given. This in my opinion would be the fault of biology and not prejudice.
As far as the media, I think they are continuing the idea that it is still a man's role, you still see more dominant role geared to the man and with in their role you notice the hiearchy especially with looks and description. They mainly cast men for power professions and then they have the "trophy wife" who is sitting at home, or spending their time at the country club.
Gender puts us into roles that are set forth in Biology, is it fair no. Example like stated in class women are given an automatic disadvantage when looking for a job, the employer automatically seperates the women from a man because of the ability to have children, women ultimatley will need to medically take off from work and care for the infant and nurture herself.
The workforce is greatly prejudice between the two genders. When you step back and look at careers today, their is definatley an identity to a profession that is chosen, another example, is that more physical jobs are geared to the male gender, now is that due to prejudice or biology? When I look at firefighters, is it realistic to believe that a female firefighter would be able to carry out a person twice their size, should the same equality be given. This in my opinion would be the fault of biology and not prejudice.
As far as the media, I think they are continuing the idea that it is still a man's role, you still see more dominant role geared to the man and with in their role you notice the hiearchy especially with looks and description. They mainly cast men for power professions and then they have the "trophy wife" who is sitting at home, or spending their time at the country club.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)